Caching Used by UK Construction Companies: Market Share (2026)
Across 241,271 trading UK construction companies, 4,556 have a detectable caching system, with LiteSpeed Cache used by 2,121 of them (46.6%).
Among 241,271 trading UK construction companies, 4,556 have a detectable Caching system, spread across 12 systems. LiteSpeed Cache accounts for 46.6% (2,121), ahead of WP Rocket at 24.8% (1,129).
Read more
LiteSpeed Cache leads every employee band: 46.3% among Under 10 employees, 48.1% among 10–50 employees, and 38.1% among Over 50 employees. The detected base is concentrated in smaller firms, with 3,298 companies in the Under 10 employees band and 1,145 in the 10–50 employees band.
The tail after the first two systems is split across W3 Total Cache at 7.6% (345), WP Super Cache at 7.0% (319), WP Fastest Cache at 5.2% (238), WP-Optimize at 4.8% (217), WPMU DEV Hummingbird at 2.3% (104), and Redis Object Cache at 1.8% (81). A further 4 systems cover 127 companies.
4,556
construction with detected Caching
Of 241,271 UK construction
1.9%
Detection rate
2026
12
Systems detected
In this category
46.6%
Leader share
LiteSpeed Cache
UK Construction Caching market share
Share of the 4,556 UK Construction with a detectable system. As of June 2026.
Caching compared
| System | UK Construction | Share | Median headcount | London share | Typical profile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LiteSpeed Cache | 2,121 | 46.6% | 5 | 13.4% | Five-person construction firms, 46.6% share |
| WP Rocket | 1,129 | 24.8% | 5 | 15.6% | Five-person construction firms, 24.8% share |
| W3 Total Cache | 345 | 7.6% | 5 | 16.5% | Five-person construction firms, 7.6% share |
| WP Super Cache | 319 | 7% | 5 | 13.2% | Five-person construction firms, 7.0% share |
| WP Fastest Cache | 238 | 5.2% | 6 | 10.1% | Six-person construction firms, 5.2% share |
| WP-Optimize | 217 | 4.8% | 6 | 15.2% | Six-person construction firms, 4.8% share |
| WPMU DEV Hummingbird | 104 | 2.3% | 8 | 10.6% | Eight-person construction firms, 2.3% share |
| Redis Object Cache | 81 | 1.8% | 6 | 9.9% | Six-person construction firms, 1.8% share |
| NitroPack | 70 | 1.5% | 5 | 21.4% | Five-person construction firms, 1.5% share |
| Blitz | 38 | 0.8% | — | — | View these companies in Firmbase → |
| Super Page Cache | 28 | 0.6% | — | — | View these companies in Firmbase → |
| FlyingPress | 6 | 0.1% | — | — | View these companies in Firmbase → |
Systems detected below the page threshold appear with counts only; their full lists are available in the Firmbase app.
Market leader by size
The leading Caching system shifts with company size: among UK Construction with under 10 employees, LiteSpeed Cache leads at 46.3% of the 3,298 with a detectable system; among UK Construction with 10–50 employees, LiteSpeed Cache leads at 48.1% of the 1,145 with a detectable system; and among UK Construction with over 50 employees, LiteSpeed Cache leads at 38.1% of the 113 with a detectable system.
Under 10 employees
46.3% of band
3,298 UK construction companies under 10 employees have detectable Caching use. LiteSpeed Cache leads at 46.3%, while the wider competitor set includes WP Rocket at 24.8% (1,129), W3 Total Cache at 7.6% (345), and WP Super Cache at 7.0% (319).
10–50 employees
48.1% of band
1,145 companies in the 10–50 employees band have detectable Caching use. LiteSpeed Cache leads at 48.1%, with competition in the wider market led by WP Rocket at 24.8% (1,129).
Over 50 employees
38.1% of band
113 companies over 50 employees have detectable Caching use. LiteSpeed Cache leads at 38.1%, a lower share than in the two smaller bands, while 4 further systems cover 127 companies across the wider market.
How Caching usage is detected
Company data
Detected companies are joined to UK Companies House records and XBRL accounts data. Revenue and headcount figures come from the most recent filed accounts; where the company has not filed, values are estimated using a model trained on filed history and peer benchmarks and are labelled as estimates.
Detection
Firmbase crawls the public website of actively-trading UK companies and fingerprints the technologies present: tracking scripts, embedded forms, chat widgets, CMS markers and similar signatures. A company is included in this list when one or more of the technology's signatures are found on its site; closely-related variants of the same product are grouped under one name. Detection covers what is visible on the public web — a company using the technology purely internally, with no website footprint, will not appear. Counts are therefore a conservative floor, not a ceiling.
Freshness
Websites are re-crawled on a rolling basis and the underlying company data is refreshed from Companies House continuously; filings appear within days of submission. The list and its statistics are regenerated when the detected cohort moves meaningfully. You can see the last-updated timestamp near the top of the page.
All product names are trademarks of their respective owners. Firmbase is not affiliated with, sponsored by, or endorsed by any trademark owner.
UK Construction by Caching
Related directories
Frequently asked questions
What is the most-used Caching among UK construction companies?
How many UK construction companies have a detectable Caching?
What is a Caching?
How is Caching usage detected?
Which has more UK construction companies, LiteSpeed Cache or WP Rocket?
What is the best Caching for UK construction companies?
Search 4,556 UK companies by the caching technology they run.
Find the right decision-makers, see verified company data, and export your list in seconds.