Turn this list into pipeline.
Social Housing Companies in Nottingham: 115 Active Firms (2026)
Social housing providers manage affordable rented homes and tenant services across Nottingham and its surrounding metropolitan area.
Buying activity sits with housing operations teams, repairs managers, tenancy administrators and local authority commissioners rather than a single commercial procurement desk. The customer mix is mainly households needing affordable or supported accommodation, councils placing or coordinating residents, and community organisations involved in welfare, maintenance and neighbourhood services. Engagements tend to be local and service-heavy: property management, rent and tenancy administration, repairs coordination, resident contact, and support work. Budgets appear modest, with organisations more likely to run lean teams and recurring service relationships than large development or national outsourcing programmes.
Read more
Nottingham has 115 actively trading social housing providers in this list, giving the local market a compact shape rather than a broad national-provider universe. The employment footprint is also small: reported headcount across the cohort is 46 staff. That points to a sector made up largely of micro-organisations, tenant-facing operators and community housing bodies, with limited internal capacity for specialist procurement, asset systems or formal resident-engagement programmes. For researchers, the useful read is not only scale, but the practical burden placed on lean teams managing homes, repairs and tenancy support.
Housing work in this category tends to sit between property operations, welfare support and council-linked commissioning. Even where providers are small, the operating context is not casual: rent collection, tenancy records, repairs response, allocations, safeguarding and complaints handling all create process obligations that buyers and partners will scrutinise. Market structure is therefore shaped less by consumer-style acquisition and more by local trust, referral routes, service continuity and the ability to evidence resident outcomes. Compliance language may vary by organisation, but the underlying procurement questions tend to be practical: who is accountable, how are repairs tracked, and how are vulnerable tenants supported.
Growth appears likely to remain incremental. The cohort looks weighted towards small, locally embedded operators, so expansion tends to depend on referrals, council relationships, property access and service reliability rather than broad sales reach. Scarcity of scaled providers also means consolidation could be attractive where back-office load, repairs coordination or compliance overheads become hard to carry alone. At the same time, tenant support is relationship-led, which may limit how far centralisation can go. The more durable organisations are likely to be those that can document service quality without losing local contact with residents.
115
Active firms
2026
44
New incorporations
incorporated since 2022
0
Above £5M
companies above the revenue threshold
Key facts
38% of the cohort was incorporated since 2022 (44 firms), so a sizeable share is in its first few filing cycles.
Social housing providers in Nottingham manage affordable rented homes, tenancy support and housing association services across the city and its surrounding metropolitan area.
Buyer needs tend to sit around repairs, compliance, finance, resident communication and day-to-day property management.
The cohort ranges from small housing associations and community-led providers to property-management vehicles serving affordable-rent tenants.
Revenue is not a clean proxy for operational reach, because providers with small payrolls may still coordinate outsourced repairs, tenant services and compliance work across a wider housing base.
Top Nottingham Social Housing companies
Pol-dom Property Management Ltd
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
GERVASE LEASEHOLD LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak
Location
SHAMSHAD TRADING SERVICES LTD
Trajectory
4y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
Lumah Property Solution Ltd
Trajectory
1y · 2024–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
PACT LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
EDUHEALTH LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak
Location
SHIPS PROPERTY HOLDINGS LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak · 0% CAGR over 4y
Location
MKKPROP LTD
Trajectory
2y · 2024–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · 0% CAGR over 1y
Location
De Jong Property Limited
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · 0% CAGR over 2y
Location
THOMAS GROUP - PROPERTY LIMITED
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
ZLE PROPERTIES LIMITED
Trajectory
1y · 2025–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
A P LETTING NOTTS LTD
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
F20 Properties Ltd
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
PETER JAKES LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
BOSTAN PROPERTY MANAGEMENT LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
Commercial Store Development Ltd
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
M&B HOMES & DEVELOPMENT LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
4Coles Property Ltd
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
PAWLEY LETS LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
SinghCor Investments Ltd
Trajectory
1y · 2025–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
Zama Kor Limited
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
MS BLOCK HOLDINGS LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
BAKER PROPERTY (NOTTINGHAM) LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
HealthyHealthy · -73% CAGR over 4y
Location
SPV PROPERTIES LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
N. Oakey Properties Ltd
Trajectory
1y · 2025–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
ANL ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
KNL ENTERPRISES LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
Acourt Investments Limited
Trajectory
4y · 2020–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
HealthyHealthy
Location
D&J SIMPLY PROPERTY LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2020–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable
Location
Caz Property Ltd
Trajectory
1y · 2025–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
ZAG Properties Limited
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed · 0% CAGR over 3y
Location
R and Z Real Estate ltd
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed · -29% CAGR over 2y
Location
Taylor & Ambalavanar Property Ltd
Trajectory
2y · 2024–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable
Location
FRANK GOULDING INVESTMENTS LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · -68% CAGR over 4y
Location
J B NOTTINGHAM LIMITED
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
Townsend Property Solutions Ltd
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
WeakWeak · 0% CAGR over 4y
Location
Ketan Investment Limited
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
Goosegate Property Limited
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
SMILE HOUSE PROPERTIES LTD
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable
Location
Renovita Ltd
Trajectory
2y · 2024–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
A H Property Rentals Ltd
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
Xianghe Ltd
Trajectory
2y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
HealthyHealthy · 0% CAGR over 1y
Location
S and N Mullaney Limited
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
Purple Panda Property Ltd
Trajectory
1y · 2024–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
LAKHANPAL ENTERPRISES LTD
Trajectory
5y · 2021–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 5 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · 0% CAGR over 4y
Location
LR911 LIMITED
Trajectory
4y · 2022–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 4 filingsFinancial Health
StrongStrong
Location
SAVITHA INVESTMENTS LTD
Trajectory
1y · 2025–NowFinancial Health
Insufficient historyInsufficient history
Location
Fifty Three Estates Limited
Trajectory
2y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable · 0% CAGR over 1y
Location
PELANTA LTD
Trajectory
2y · 2024–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 2 filingsFinancial Health
DistressedDistressed
Location
Niven Property Management Ltd
Trajectory
3y · 2023–NowFinancial sub-scores
Computed from 3 filingsFinancial Health
StableStable
Location
Unlock all 115 leads
Showing 50 of 115 — +65 more with verified decision-maker contacts, live data, and CRM sync.
How Nottingham Social Housing companies work and how to sell to them
What they do
Social housing providers in Nottingham earn income through rents, service charges, housing-management fees and, for some, council-linked support or placement arrangements. The offer is partly a physical asset and partly a service model: accommodation, tenancy administration, repairs coordination, arrears handling, complaints management and resident support. Revenue is usually recurring, but margins can be constrained by maintenance costs and welfare-facing work that does not scale neatly. Commercial relationships are therefore less like software subscriptions and more like local service contracts, with value judged through occupancy, rent collection, response times, tenant outcomes and the provider's ability to keep records tidy.
Who they sell to
Most operators serve households needing affordable rented or supported accommodation, while councils and community partners shape referrals, placements and funding routes. When these organisations buy from suppliers, the practical decision-makers are often housing managers, repairs leads, tenancy administrators, finance officers and trustees or directors in smaller bodies. Local authority involvement can add formal procurement, quotes or framework-style checks, but many lower-value decisions appear relationship-led and direct. Sales cycles tend to follow operational urgency: a repairs backlog, a rent-processing problem or a complaints issue can move faster than a broader housing-management change, which usually needs board comfort and evidence that tenants will not be disrupted.
What they buy
Most social housing firms tend to spend on tools and services that reduce administrative drag rather than expand revenue. Useful categories include housing-management systems, rent accounting, repairs scheduling, resident communications, document storage, case management, complaints tracking and basic reporting. Outside software, likely needs include bookkeeping, audit support, insurance advice, legal help on tenancy matters, recruitment for housing officers, and contractors for repairs and property checks. Smaller Nottingham providers may prefer packages that can be adopted by non-specialist staff, priced predictably, and supported by plain implementation help. Integration with existing spreadsheets, email and council reporting routines is often more persuasive than a broad platform pitch.
Why and how to sell to them
Pain points usually come from capacity rather than appetite for change: small teams need to evidence repairs activity, manage arrears, keep tenancy records current and respond to vulnerable residents without adding another administrative layer. Buying triggers include new council work, a change in housing manager, a complaints spike, a repairs backlog, or new properties that make manual coordination harder. The 44 providers incorporated since 2022 may be setting up basic finance, tenancy and resident-contact processes for the first time. Outbound works better when it is framed around accountable service delivery, clearer records and less chasing between residents, contractors and councils, rather than abstract efficiency claims.
How this list is built
Data sources
This list is built from UK Companies House filings, XBRL accounts data, and semantic analysis of each company's public website. Revenue and headcount figures come from the most recent filed accounts; where the company has not filed, values are estimated using a model trained on filed history and peer benchmarks and are labelled as estimates.
Classification
Rather than relying solely on SIC codes, Firmbase classifies each company semantically: the company's website is crawled, an AI model reads what the company actually sells, and the company is placed into the relevant industry and subsectors. SIC codes are used as one signal but not the only one. This means a company that registered under a generic SIC code but pivoted into (for example) fintech is correctly identified as fintech, not as its original SIC category.
Freshness
The underlying company data is refreshed from Companies House continuously; filings appear in the list within days of submission. The curated list ordering is regenerated when the underlying data moves meaningfully (company count changes by more than 5%, a new company enters the top-ranked segment, or the filed-revenue numbers for the top firms change). You can see the last-updated timestamp near the top of the page.
Also in Nottingham
Related directories
Frequently asked questions
How many social housing companies are there in Nottingham?
What counts as a social housing company in this list?
Which are the largest social housing companies in Nottingham?
What do social housing companies in Nottingham actually do?
How does Nottingham social housing compare internationally?
How is this list built and how fresh is the data?
How big are the typical social housing companies in Nottingham?
Are these mostly new or established social housing companies?
What SIC codes does this use?
What buying signals should I look for?
Push these 115 companies into your pipeline.
Find the right decision-makers, see verified company data, and export your list in seconds.

















































